Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(6): 2749-2754, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36625868

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique. METHODS: An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department. RESULTS: The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82; p = 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.


Assuntos
Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva Condutiva , Humanos , Perda Auditiva Condutiva/cirurgia , Auxiliares de Audição/efeitos adversos , Orelha , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Condução Óssea
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...